Insolvency Procedures in India: An Overview of Legal Framework and Practices

RESTRUCTURING & INSOLVENCY

12/2/20245 min read

Insolvency is a legal state where an individual or company is unable to meet its financial obligations due to an overwhelming amount of debt. In India, insolvency procedures are designed to ensure the fair treatment of creditors and debtors, while providing a framework for debt recovery and resolution. Over the years, India has made significant strides in developing a robust insolvency regime, with the introduction of laws and regulations that aim to streamline the resolution process, promote ease of doing business, and restore confidence in financial markets.

This article provides a detailed analysis of the insolvency procedures in India, focusing on the legal framework, key regulations, stakeholders involved, and the steps taken to resolve insolvency issues in both corporate and individual contexts.

1. Legal Framework for Insolvency in India

The primary legal framework governing insolvency procedures in India is the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The IBC was enacted to consolidate and amend the laws relating to reorganization and insolvency resolution of corporate persons, partnership firms, and individuals in a time-bound manner. The IBC aims to address the deficiencies of the previous system and create a more efficient process for insolvency resolution.

Before the enactment of the IBC, insolvency and bankruptcy proceedings were governed by various laws, including:

  • The Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 (SICA), which dealt primarily with the rehabilitation of distressed companies.

  • The Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 (RDDBFI), which provided for the establishment of debt recovery tribunals.

  • The Companies Act, 2013, which had provisions related to winding up of companies.

The IBC, however, brought a more streamlined, unified, and effective framework for addressing insolvency issues and resolving financial distress.

2. Insolvency Resolution Process for Companies and Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs)

The insolvency process for companies and LLPs in India is governed by the provisions of the IBC, primarily under Part II of the Code, which deals with the insolvency resolution and liquidation of corporate persons. The key steps involved in the corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) are:

Initiation of the Process

  • Application by Financial Creditors: The insolvency process can be initiated by a financial creditor (banks, financial institutions, or bondholders) through the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) by filing a petition for the initiation of CIRP.

  • Application by Operational Creditors: Operational creditors (suppliers, service providers, etc.) can also file a petition if the debt owed is more than Rs. 1 lakh. The application must be accompanied by a demand notice and evidence of default.

  • Corporate Debtors: In some cases, the debtor company itself may file for insolvency if it is unable to pay its debts.

Appointment of Interim Resolution Professional (IRP)

Once the NCLT admits the petition, it appoints an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) to take charge of the company’s affairs, manage its assets, and oversee the operations during the insolvency process. The IRP must act impartially and in the best interests of the creditors.

Formation of the Committee of Creditors (CoC)

A Committee of Creditors (CoC) is formed, consisting of financial creditors who are responsible for deciding the course of action during the resolution process. The CoC plays a crucial role in approving the resolution plan, selecting the resolution professional (RP), and approving any decisions related to the insolvency proceedings.

Resolution Plan

The RP, with the assistance of the CoC, invites resolution plans from potential investors, stakeholders, or bidders to rescue the company. A resolution plan must detail how the debt will be restructured and how the business will continue to operate. The plan must be approved by at least 66% of the CoC members.

Approval or Liquidation

If a resolution plan is approved by the CoC, it is submitted to the NCLT for final approval. Once approved, the company undergoes restructuring as per the terms of the resolution plan. If no plan is approved within 180 days (with a possible extension of 90 days), the company is liquidated, and its assets are sold to repay creditors.

3. Insolvency Resolution for Individuals and Partnership Firms

Insolvency procedures for individuals and partnership firms in India are covered under Part III of the IBC. The process for individual and partnership insolvency is somewhat similar to that of corporate insolvency but includes some key differences.

Filing for Insolvency

  • Application by Debtor: The debtor may initiate insolvency proceedings by filing a petition with the NCLT. This applies to individuals or partnerships that are unable to pay their debts.

  • Application by Creditor: Creditors can also apply to initiate insolvency proceedings if the debtor defaults on payment.

Appointment of Insolvency Resolution Professional (IRP)

Once the application is admitted, an IRP is appointed to oversee the proceedings. The IRP’s role is to assess the debtor’s assets, liabilities, and financial situation and make recommendations on the resolution process.

Resolution Plan

For individuals and partnership firms, the focus is primarily on the resolution of the debtor’s outstanding liabilities and restructuring them in a way that is mutually beneficial to both creditors and the debtor. The IRP works with the creditors and the debtor to prepare a repayment plan, which may include asset liquidation or a reduced settlement of debts.

If no resolution is found, the debtor may undergo liquidation, and their assets are sold to repay creditors. In some cases, the debtor may also be discharged from further liability once the bankruptcy process is completed.

4. Key Stakeholders Involved in Insolvency Procedures

Several key stakeholders are involved in the insolvency process, each with specific roles and responsibilities:

  • Financial Creditors: These are creditors who have provided funds to the company, usually in the form of loans or debt instruments. They play a critical role in the decision-making process, particularly during the approval of the resolution plan.

  • Operational Creditors: These creditors are suppliers of goods or services. They are typically at the bottom of the creditor hierarchy but still have voting rights in the CIRP.

  • Resolution Professional (RP): An RP is appointed to manage the day-to-day operations and affairs of the insolvent entity. They are responsible for ensuring the insolvency process runs smoothly and that all legal requirements are met.

  • Committee of Creditors (CoC): The CoC is a group of creditors, usually consisting of financial creditors, who vote on important decisions during the insolvency process, including approving resolution plans.

  • National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT): The NCLT is the judicial body that handles insolvency cases in India. It is responsible for admitting applications, approving plans, and overseeing liquidation.

5. Benefits of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC)

The introduction of the IBC has brought several advantages to India’s insolvency ecosystem:

  • Timely Resolution: The IBC provides a time-bound process, typically within 180 days (with an extension of up to 90 days), which ensures quick resolution and minimizes delays in debt recovery.

  • Improved Creditor Recovery: The IBC prioritizes the interests of creditors and has led to a higher recovery rate compared to previous laws.

  • Regulatory Certainty: The IBC has created a single, clear legal framework for both corporate and individual insolvency, improving legal certainty for all parties involved.

  • Encouragement of Business Revival: The focus of the IBC is on the rehabilitation of distressed businesses, which helps preserve jobs and supports economic growth.

6. Challenges and Criticisms

While the IBC has significantly improved the insolvency process, there are still challenges and criticisms:

  • Lengthy Delays: Although the IBC sets a time limit for resolution, the process is often delayed due to judicial inefficiencies and procedural bottlenecks.

  • Complexity in Resolution Plans: Some creditors may not always agree on the terms of the resolution plan, leading to extended negotiations and disputes.

  • Limited Capacity of NCLT: The NCLT has faced a backlog of cases, which can delay the resolution process further.

7. Conclusion

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code has revolutionized the way insolvency and bankruptcy are handled in India, offering a more transparent and efficient system for debt resolution. Despite some challenges, the framework established by the IBC has been instrumental in improving the speed of insolvency resolution, providing better outcomes for creditors, and fostering a culture of corporate responsibility. As the system matures, it is expected that the insolvency landscape in India will continue to evolve, helping businesses and individuals alike resolve their financial distress in a fair and structured manner.